FAF

中文版
NEWS
Keep up-to-date with industry-leading technologies
Your location:
Homepage
/
News
/
company news
/
Comparison and analysis of the cost of tube belt conveyor and fully enclosed corridor belt conveyor

Comparison and analysis of the cost of tube belt conveyor and fully enclosed corridor belt conveyor

  • Classification: company news
  • Author:
  • Source:
  • Release time: 2020-03-27
  • Views:3

【概要描述】On April 28, 2019, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment and other 5 departments jointly issued the "Opinions on Promoting the Implementation of Ultra-Low Emissions in the Iron and Steel Industry", and the summary of the material transport links in the opinions:

Comparison and analysis of the cost of tube belt conveyor and fully enclosed corridor belt conveyor

(Summary description)On April 28, 2019, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment and other 5 departments jointly issued the "Opinions on Promoting the Implementation of Ultra-Low Emissions in the Iron and Steel Industry", and the summary of the material transport links in the opinions:

  • Categories:company news
  • Author:
  • Origin:
  • Time of issue:2020-03-27
  • Views:3
Information
On April 28, 2019, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment and other 5 departments jointly issued the "Opinions on Promoting the Implementation of Ultra-Low Emissions in the Iron and Steel Industry", and the summary of the material transport links in the opinions:
2. Material transportation. Powdery materials such as lime, dedusting ash, desulfurization ash, and fly ash shall be transported in a closed manner using tubular belt conveyors, pneumatic conveying equipment, tankers, etc. Iron ore concentrate, coal, coke, sintered ore, pellets, limestone, dolomite, ferroalloy, blast furnace slag, steel slag, desulfurized gypsum and other bulk or sticky materials should be transported in a closed manner using a tubular belt conveyor, or Adopt belt corridors and other methods for closed transportation; if it is really necessary for automobile transportation, use closed compartments or tightly closed lids, and dust suppression measures such as humidification should be taken when loading and unloading vehicles. Material conveying and dropping points should be equipped with air collection hoods and dust removal facilities, or dust suppression measures such as spraying should be taken. Wheel and body washing facilities shall be provided at the exit of the yard. The roads in the factory area should be hardened, and measures such as cleaning and watering should be taken to keep them clean.
The conveyance of non-powdered materials strictly requires the use of a tube belt machine or a fully sealed belt corridor. Based on the weight and cost of these two conveying forms, the following comparative analysis is made for reference in design-related decisions.
 
I. Comparison of conditions
输送 1. Conveying materials: coal, specific gravity 0.85, capacity 250t / h, block below 80mm, room temperature;
2, the belt conveyor belt speed is 2.5, the pipe diameter is 250mm; the groove belt conveyor belt speed is 1.6, and the bandwidth is 800mm;
3. Both the belt conveyor and the belt conveyor take the aisle on both sides, and the aisle width is 800mm;
4. Both the belt conveyor and the belt conveyor are overhead structures with a unified span of 24m;
5. The distance between the upper and lower rollers of the straight section of the tube belt machine is 1.6m, the distance between the upper rollers of the belt conveyor is 1.2m, and the distance between the lower rollers is 3 meters;
6. The total length of the conveyor is 200 meters, considering the selection and driving of the tape. The groove belt power is 37kw and the tube belt power is 75kw.
7. The tube truss structure is as follows:
hd
　　8. The structure of the fully enclosed belt truss is as follows:
hd
　　9. The cost comparison does not consider the supporting columns and the head and tail driving parts for the time being, and only compares the structure of 24 meters truss with the closure, belt and roller;
　　
Summary of weight comparison
　　1. Weight comparison of supporting roller model

 

Roller model

Number of rollers

Roller single weight kg

Roller total weight kg

Single weight of stand kg

Total weight of stand kg

Belt conveyor

89x315

60

3.59

215.4

11.32

226.4

Tube belt machine

89x230

90

2.75

247.5

2

180
　　1) The belt carrier supporting rollers are standard three rollers with 35-degree slot angle;
　　2) The supporting rollers of the tube belt machine are arranged in the form of hexagons on both sides;
　　2.Comparison of weights of backhaul roller models

 

Roller model

Number of rollers

Roller single weight kg

Roller total weight kg

Single weight of stand kg

Total weight of stand kg

Belt conveyor

89x950

8

9.73

77.84

3.77

30.16

Tube belt machine

89x230

90

2.75

247.5

2

180
　　1) The return roller of the belt conveyor is a standard parallel lower roller;
　　2) The return rollers of the tube belt machine are arranged on both sides of the hexagon;
　　3. Comparison of the weight of the middle frame leg structure

 

Weight of intermediate frame kg

Number of outriggers

Number of Outriggers II

Outrigger weight kg

Total weight of structure kg

Belt conveyor

358

4

4

133

491

Tube belt machine

0

0

0

0

0
　　1) The middle frame and outriggers are selected according to light and medium standards
　　2) The H value of the outrigger is selected according to 800;
　　4, weight comparison of tape models

 

Tape model

Tape single weight kg

Tape weight kg

Belt conveyor

B800-EP100 / 4 (4.5 + 1.5)

9.376

450

Tube belt machine

B1000-GEP200 / 4 (5 + 3)

14.8

710.4
　　5. Weight comparison of tr